Match statistics snapshot
- FC Eindhoven fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- FC Eindhoven was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
- Almere City FC held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Eindhoven | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Eindhoven | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 419Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Eindhoven | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Eindhoven | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Eindhoven | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |