Match statistics snapshot
- FC Ingolstadt 04 created the clearer chances on xG (4.08 vs 1.92, Δ 2.16).
- FC Ingolstadt 04 fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- FC Ingolstadt 04 was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Ssv Ulm 1846 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Ssv Ulm 1846 |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 298 |
| 442Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Ssv Ulm 1846 |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Ssv Ulm 1846 |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Ssv Ulm 1846 |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |