Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 1.78, Δ 0.86).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 10%).
- Verl held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 325 | Accurate passes | 534Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 623Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Ingolstadt 04 | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.