Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.