Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 11%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.