Match statistics snapshot
- FC Juarez created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.54, Δ 0.30).
- FC Juarez fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- FC Juarez held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 346Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 400Lead | Total passes | 292 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.44 | Goals prevented | -1.44 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Juarez | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |