Match statistics snapshot
- FC Lugano created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 0.81, Δ 1.43).
- FC Lugano held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 322Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |