Match statistics snapshot
- FC Lugano created the clearer chances on xG (2.74 vs 1.30, Δ 1.44).
- Grasshoppers fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 518Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Lugano | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.