Match statistics snapshot
- Vikingur Reykjavik created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.68, Δ 0.04).
- FC Noah fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- FC Noah was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Noah | Statistic | Vikingur Reykjavik |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Noah | Statistic | Vikingur Reykjavik |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 401Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 498Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Noah | Statistic | Vikingur Reykjavik |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Noah | Statistic | Vikingur Reykjavik |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.46 | Goals prevented | 1.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Noah | Statistic | Vikingur Reykjavik |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.