Match statistics snapshot
- FC Nordsjaelland fired more attempts (13 vs 2 shots).
- Hobro was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 46%).
- FC Nordsjaelland held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Nordsjaelland | Statistic | Hobro |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Nordsjaelland | Statistic | Hobro |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Nordsjaelland | Statistic | Hobro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Nordsjaelland | Statistic | Hobro |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Nordsjaelland | Statistic | Hobro |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |