Match statistics snapshot
- FC OSS fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- FC OSS was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Jong AZ held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 428Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |