Match statistics snapshot
- MVV fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- MVV was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- MVV held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3Lead |
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 181 | Accurate passes | 521Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 638Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |