Match statistics snapshot
- MVV fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- FC OSS was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 19%).
- MVV held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| 11Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 225 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Oss | Statistic | Mvv |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |