Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.20, Δ 1.45).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (23 vs 3 shots).
- Boavista was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.20 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 78%Lead | Ball possession | 22% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 498Lead | Accurate passes | 106 |
| 567Lead | Total passes | 160 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 9 |
Statistics is not available yet.