Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.19, Δ 1.84).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.19 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 586Lead | Accurate passes | 139 |
| 640Lead | Total passes | 201 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.45 | Goals prevented | -1.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.