Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (2.81 vs 1.25, Δ 1.56).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 550Lead | Accurate passes | 238 |
| 632Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.