Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (4.13 vs 1.02, Δ 3.11).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (25 vs 13 shots).
- FC Porto held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 4.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 114 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 169 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| 2.30 | Goals prevented | 2.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |