Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (2.29 vs 0.55, Δ 1.74).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- FC Porto held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 2.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 366Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -1.08 | Goals prevented | -1.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.