Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.20, Δ 1.28).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.20 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 491Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 220 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 23Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |