Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (2.95 vs 0.11, Δ 2.84).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (22 vs 5 shots).
- Tondela was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 2.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.11 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Porto | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |