Match statistics snapshot
- Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 2.46, Δ 1.14).
- Dynamo fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.46Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 7 |
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 289 | Accurate passes | 294Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 377Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |