Match statistics snapshot
- Fakel created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 2.48, Δ 0.99).
- Fakel fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- FC Rostov was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.48Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 325Lead | Accurate passes | 141 |
| 418Lead | Total passes | 229 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Rostov | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.