Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 2.44, Δ 1.64).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc St. Pauli | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.44Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc St. Pauli | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 249 | Accurate passes | 497Lead |
| 347 | Total passes | 594Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc St. Pauli | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc St. Pauli | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.98 | Goals prevented | -0.98 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc St. Pauli | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.