Match statistics snapshot
- FC Thun created the clearer chances on xG (3.41 vs 3.30, Δ 0.11).
- BSC Young Boys fired more attempts (21 vs 15 shots).
- FC Thun was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Thun | Statistic | Bsc Young Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 3.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 3.30 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13 | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Thun | Statistic | Bsc Young Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 188 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 283 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Thun | Statistic | Bsc Young Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Thun | Statistic | Bsc Young Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Thun | Statistic | Bsc Young Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.