Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.70 vs 2.17, Δ 0.53).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- Cerezo Osaka held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 439Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.