Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 1.17, Δ 0.30).
- FC Tokyo held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 547Lead | Total passes | 320 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |