Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 1.06, Δ 1.10).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 323 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.