Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 1.17, Δ 0.91).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Kawasaki Frontale was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 492Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.