Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 0.45, Δ 1.71).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Machida Zelvia was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 399Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 502Lead | Total passes | 273 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.