Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.94 vs 0.77, Δ 2.17).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 373 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.