Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 262 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 508Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.