Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (2.81 vs 0.61, Δ 2.20).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.