Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 37%).
- Oita Trinita held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 402 | Accurate passes | 491Lead |
| 478 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Tokyo | Statistic | Oita Trinita |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |