Match statistics snapshot
- PEC Zwolle created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 1.89, Δ 0.99).
- PEC Zwolle fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89Lead |
| 4Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 231 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.