Match statistics snapshot
- Vitesse created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 1.42, Δ 0.66).
- Vitesse fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- FC Volendam was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 69%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 146 | Accurate passes | 534Lead |
| 232 | Total passes | 614Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Volendam | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.