Match statistics snapshot
- FC Winterthur created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 1.32, Δ 0.34).
- FC Winterthur fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- FC Winterthur was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Winterthur | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Winterthur | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 422Lead | Total passes | 349 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Winterthur | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Winterthur | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Winterthur | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.