Match statistics snapshot
- Grasshoppers created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 2.06, Δ 1.25).
- Grasshoppers fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- FC Zurich was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 238Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 357Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |