Match statistics snapshot
- FC Zurich created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 0.48, Δ 0.48).
- Grasshoppers fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Grasshoppers held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 470Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.