Match statistics snapshot
- FC Zurich created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.11, Δ 0.33).
- Lausanne fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- FC Zurich was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Lausanne |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Lausanne |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 295Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 372Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Lausanne |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Lausanne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Zurich | Statistic | Lausanne |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.