Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (2.55 vs 0.53, Δ 2.02).
- FCSB fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 548Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |