Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 2.13, Δ 0.92).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- FCSB held more of the ball (59% possession).
Fcsb vs Rapid
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 410Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |