Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 0.48, Δ 1.87).
- FCSB fired more attempts (22 vs 6 shots).
- FCSB held more of the ball (59% possession).
Fcsb vs Rapid
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 22Lead | Total shots | 6 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 238 |
| 486Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Other
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Free Kicks | 8 |