Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 0.68, Δ 1.46).
- FCSB fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- FCSB held more of the ball (59% possession).
Fcsb vs Rīgas Fs
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 507Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 583Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -1.70 | Goals prevented | -1.70 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |