Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 1.26, Δ 0.89).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 416 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 476 | Total passes | 572Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |