Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 0.07, Δ 1.34).
- FCSB fired more attempts (12 vs 3 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fcsb | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.