Match statistics snapshot
- Feralpisalo fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Cittadella was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 275Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 397 | Total passes | 406Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.