Match statistics snapshot
- Feralpisalo fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Feralpisalo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 288Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 390Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Feralpisalo | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.