Match statistics snapshot
- Ferencvarosi TC created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 0.74, Δ 0.96).
- Ferencvarosi TC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
- AZ Alkmaar held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 555Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.37 | Goals prevented | -1.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.