Match statistics snapshot
- Ferencvarosi TC created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 0.37, Δ 1.67).
- Ferencvarosi TC fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Cukaricki was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 428Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |