Match statistics snapshot
- Ferencvarosi TC created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.00, Δ 0.20).
- Nice fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Ferencvarosi TC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 393 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.63 | Goals prevented | -0.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferencvarosi Tc | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |